After the Webinar: The Use of Social Media to Investigate Animal Crime. Q&A with Adam Leath

Webinar presenter Adam Leath answered a number of your questions after his presentation, The Use of Social Media to Investigate Animal Crime.   Here are just a few of his responses.

 

Audience Question: Will my personal phone have to be seized during an investigation if I use my personal phone to gain information from Facebook or Instagram? 

Adam Leath: Well as I outlined earlier Aaron you know it’s definitely something you should be consulting with law enforcement and your prosecutor and your specific jurisdiction. But if it is readily consumable information, it’s a public access account, anyone with an internet connection whether that is a mobile device or a computer, that information is not unique to your device it could be accessed anywhere. In that situation, I wouldn’t see that there will be a need for your own personal phone to be put in any type of evidence because it’s not accessing information that is not currently available to everyone else.

 

 

Audience Question: Do we need a warrant to place a GPS locator on a vehicle? 

Adam Leath: That is very jurisdiction specific. I would say that there is a vast majority of cases and the answer is yes. I’ve seen some very rare exceptions to that but you absolutely would need to be consulting with your local prosecutor. But the question is going to be as if you ever need a warrant, the likely answer is going to be yes. If you have time to get it, there is always a good reason to get one and make sure that you have all your bases covered. But with GPS trackers I can only think of maybe one instance where I see a jurisdiction not have to get a warrant in order to utilize it.

 

 

Audience Question: Our main focus is on dogfighting, but can the same techniques be used for cockfighters as well? 

Adam Leath: Yes, there are a number of publicly consumable profile accounts that describes every type of cockfighting, dogfighting, hoarding, puppy mills, rescue groups, there’s all sort of things that an investigator would need to be looking into. But I would say that the best way to start is going to be with any investigation, identify who it is that you’re working with, what information can you find about them, it should really be a tool that every investigator utilizes just to gain background information of about the suspects you’re working with and cockfighting is a great example of that. Even though this example was with dog fighting, cockfighting cases, very similarly we’ll also post information and discuss things in very similar ways.

 

 

Audience Question: Is the defendant in your case study typical for dog fighters or is he more of a wannabe? 

Adam Leath: Luckily for us and in many of you, your states don’t differentiate between the two whether they are a wannabe or they are on a street fighter or a hobbyist or professional dogfighter. It’s really not based upon the level of engagement but rather the acts that take place. So, I don’t think that this is a, what I would say a typical presentation of anyone who will be considered by many standards to be an organized dogfighter or hobbyist or even a street-level dogfighter, this would be someone who is really starting to gain understanding. Do I think that he would gone on and continued, the answer is yes. I think that he absolutely would have, so I saw this is an opportunity for us to intervene early and potentially have some redirecting of potential activities so that we don’t see someone continue to hone and cultivate additional harm on animals in the future.

 

 

Audience Question: Just trying to understand, why he received a suspended sentence and whether or not you can share anything about why or if there are things you or your agency might have been able to do differently to affect the outcome? 

Adam Leath: The prosecutor in this case, as with any case, has the ultimate prosecutorial discretion on what that offer would be and whether or not that is something that is consistent with a lot of number of factors that they are considering not to least of which is prior criminal history, the egregiousness of the crime. So, in those particular instances in my conversation with the prosecutor and in my interactions with the court system on this particular case, I can only point to the fact that there  was a juvenile that they were working to trying to get a custody of, which regardless of what your opinion may or may not be about the situation. He did not have a violent criminal history and didn’t score prison and in Florida it is done in a point system so you really do have to have a specific threshold of points  and previous history before you would even score to prison and the reality in this situation because he had a number of narcotic charges, his habits is going to be very difficult for him to break only from the standpoint that he has to submit to a random drug testing over that four year period of time, cannot have any contact with animals, so no animals in his chair, custody or control and has to submit to those random drug testing and random searches of his residence. So while I agree, I would love for there not to be suspended sentences especially on egregiousness cases like this, I can certainly understand and appreciate where the prosecutor is coming from if they are willing to accept a plea and willing to provide conditions to reduce and eliminate the possibility of this individual continuing to hone their skills. And combine it with the fact that even if they were found guilty on all of this charges, no previous criminal history, I can gain a better appreciation and understanding from where they are coming from but ultimately that’s their decision and the court’s decision.

 

 

Audience Question: What is a Jenny? 

Adam Leath: So a jenny is a device that’s utilized to build or put wind as all the proprietors would describe it. Cardiovascular exercise so generally a smaller, it can be  a stuffed animal anything that there willing to chase around on one side of that particular device and the dog is chained to the other side so essentially they would run in a circle for a long period of time, building up the cardiovascular endurance of a particular dog which is particularly attractive characteristic because fighting is or does take a great deal of cardiovascular strength, they even endure something like that much less continued to do that past the point of exhaustion over a prolonged period of time. The thought is if they will continue to work them out and continue to build up their cardiovascular endurance they’re more apt to be successful at continuing to engage one another in an actual pit during the fight.

 

 

Audience Question: Did you have to do anything special to get the social media introduced as evidence for the court case? 

Adam Leath: In our case, we ended up in certainly something that we provided as evidence but it was not something that was not needed because the social media at that point garnered the additional step of being able to get all of the other evidence that we utilized. Some of the best evidence was the video of him actually fighting the dogs, his own cellphone video. So, at that point, while yes the social media was incredibly valuable, without it we couldn’t have gotten to that point. But by the time we got the additional evidence we were able to really use that as the crux of what we needed in our particular case but because this didn’t go to trial none of it was presented to a jury, the judge had access to all of those things it was really just  a snippet in time to get us to the next step in our investigation.

 

Audience Question: Can you give examples of misinformation that might have been put out to derail an investigation on social media? 

Adam Leath: The best examples are going to be in cases of animal hoarding or in rescue cases where the individual may have started out legitimate but is clearly not providing reasonable standards of care now. So, whether it’s to put out their own post, “Hey animal control was out here or the sheriff’s office they are just taking my animals away and they’re going to euthanized them all, I’m the one that’s really providing care for them, I’m the one who just trying to do the best I can and look at that big bad  government and all the things that they are trying to do to me. I’m not actually the one that’s going to save them and if it weren’t for me all of them would be on the streets.” Providing sort of public sympathy if you will or beginning to try the case to the court in public opinion rather than allowing that process to go through criminal justice system but derailing the case by providing misinformation or trying to sway public opinion away from actually the facts. The challenge is that your agency is not going to be able to come back and say, “No, in fact here’s exactly what you took place, here is the evidence that we took from your property.” Because that is not how it works that come out during the course of the trial or some type of court proceeding. If you are finding that they are putting that information out it’s very difficult to sort of stop that if they get ahead of it or get ahead of you with that information. So I would say there a whole other course of what you can, should or shouldn’t say on to media during your criminal case. But for an agency, it can be incredibly problematic because individuals can put a lot of misinformation that can really derail what it is that you’re legitimately doing in the investigation as a response to some type of allegation that you’re investigating with.

 

Click Here to Watch a Recording of The Use of Social Media to Investigate Animal Crime.

Additional Resources
X